They’ve blatantly ignored my pleas to address consent issues, it’s an ethical disaster. The medical ‘profession’ has been complicit in this assault on bodily integrity. Valid voluntary consent has been trashed. Politicians and health/medical officers have coerced people to submit to these dodgy jabs, repeatedly, to keep their jobs – No Jab, No Job – and to otherwise participate in civil society. In Australia these rubbish, and potentially harmful, injections are mandated for millions of people – how appalling that this is happening in a supposed ‘liberal democracy’, coercive medical interventions. It was known from the beginning this disease wasn’t a serious threat to most people, and yet it was used to steal people’s freedom and bodily integrity, coercing people to submit to the now obviously defective Covid jabs. When is this Covid debacle going to be properly called out without all the procrastination? And maybe we are in a tipping balance in terms of whether we accept this as the standard way of doing things, which I think would be terrible, or maybe we go in a different direction, where we say, this was a fiasco, let’s make sure it doesn’t happen again.Ĭrikey! What a tortuous experience watching this interview with Martin Kulldorff and Freddie Sayers… So I think the consequences are profound. I think there’s also economic consequences of these lockdowns that we’re starting to see now. They’re obviously enormous public health consequences from the collateral damage, which I mentioned. I’m sure there will be consequences, political consequences as well. I think that will take decades to repair, if it can be repaired, I don’t know. I think there will be an enormous distrust in science, in the scientific community. I think there will be an enormous distrust in public health agencies. On the effects of mishandling the pandemic… So in terms of deciding what is the optimal thing to do, these models that Imperial College developed, I think were very useless. The optimal strategy doesn’t depend on if it’s 0.1%, or 1% because the optimal strategy depends on the difference, the relative risk in the difference by age or some other factor. And the key thing is what is the optimal strategy to use? So in the case of Covid, in the beginning, we didn’t know exactly what was the infection-fatality rate, which is what’s the risk of dying if you get infected, because we didn’t know how many people had got infected. I think these models where you predict a certain number of people are going to die, are pretty useless. On the problems with epidemiological modelling… And if we don’t have open discourse about science, science is going to die. I think that’s a huge problem for science as we move forward, because science can only thrive with discussions. So there was support, yes, from individuals. I got private emails from many of the faculty members, many of whom I’d never heard of before. No, I didn’t get much defence from the university, no. On whether he was supported by Harvard after speaking out… But I think the key thing was to show the public that there was not scientific consensus for lockdowns. We were attacked, including by the NIH Director Collins and Anthony Fauci and Jeremy Farrar at the Wellcome Trust here and Christian Drosten in Germany who called us pseudo-scientists. All of us came from reasonably respectable universities: Oxford, Harvard and Stanford. All of the three of us have worked on infectious disease technology. The difference was that it came from three people other than one person. On the reaction to the Great Barrington Declaration… These vaccine fanatics who insisted that everybody should be vaccinated, including those who already have immunity from having recovered from Covid, I think they have destroyed the confidence in vaccines in general, to an extent that a small group of pre-Covid, so-called anti-vaxxers had never succeeded. So by pushing these vaccines on those who already had Covid, was both unnecessary and unethical, but it also diminishes the trust in public health authorities and diminishes the trust in vaccines. It would have been shocking if the immunity from the vaccine was better than the immunity from having recovered from Covid. We’ve known about natural immunity since 430 BC during the Athenian plague. On the scientific community’s denial of natural immunity…
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |